Cards v Roster Sheets
the only one that uses roster sheets. Ill admit being biased towards EI due to it
being my first gaming purchase, so right off the bat
it should be fairly clear I prefer roster sheets over individual player cards. But this is
not to say I completely write-off the use of
player cards. APBA, Strat and Statis-Pro use player cards, and they are all fun games.
Many people who play those say they can
tell how good a player is just by looking at their card. I dont count myself in that
crowd, but I give props to those who are.
In my mind, I have to decide which is more efficient: playing a full slate of games, one
after the other in a manner that allows each
team to see action, or playing a three or four game series using the same two teams
because its easier to do this instead of putting
cards away and setting up the next two teams to play a single game. Im not sure I
wrote that very clearly, so Ill try an example.
assumption that I am super organized, and I have a calendar hanging on my wall with the
schedule listed and that it looks something like this
April 3 |
April 4 |
April 5 |
April 6 |
Dodgers @ Braves |
Dodgers @ Braves |
Dodgers @ Braves |
Dodgers @ Braves |
would then play the Reds-Mets series. After those four games are done, Id set up the
cards to play the Cubs-Giants series, and so on until
the final game of the Cardinal-Phillies game is completed. Nothing wrong with that method.
Ive done it that way zillions of times. Gazillions
of times, in fact. With EI, I would fill out the lineups for each team for the games
scheduled for April 3. I would then proceed to play each of
the scheduled games for that day, and all eight teams would have a game played under their
belts. Since I use injuries, I wouldnt be able to
do the same with the player cards, since I cant predict if the players used in game
two, for example, would be able to play in game three due
to an injury. EI allows me to have a season unfold day by day, just like the real thing!
November 15, 2023